• What is UNN?
  • Why UNN?
  • Our Team
  • Support Us
Wednesday, September 27, 2023
  • Login
  • Home
  • Featured stories
  • Editors Choice
  • Trending Stories
  • News
  • Africa Today
  • Opinion
  • Literature
  • Videos
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Featured stories
  • Editors Choice
  • Trending Stories
  • News
  • Africa Today
  • Opinion
  • Literature
  • Videos
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
UNN Times
No Result
View All Result
Home Featured stories

Court Martials Have No Authority on Civilians – rules Justice Elizabeth Musoke

Ronald Mugabi | UNN Times ReporterbyRonald Mugabi | UNN Times Reporter
December 21, 2022
in Featured stories, News, Trending Stories, Uganda
0
Court Martials Have No Authority on Civilians – rules Justice Elizabeth Musoke
12
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

KAMPALA – The Constitutional Court has for the second time in less than two years ruled that military courts have no power to try civilians.

In a majority ruling written by now Supreme Court, Justice Elizabeth Musoke, the court held that Military Courts are not courts of judicature as defined by the constitution and therefore, couldn’t try anybody beyond those in military service.

RELATED STORIES

She Cranes Coach Mugerwa Threatens to Resign over Mistreatment

She Cranes Coach Mugerwa Threatens to Resign over Mistreatment

August 8, 2023
When Museveni Assured Basoga of Subsistence Life

When Museveni Assured Basoga of Subsistence Life

July 16, 2023
When Gun-violence, Brutality Dominated Law Society Report

When Gun-violence, Brutality Dominated Law Society Report

July 15, 2023
Why URA is facing a Parliamentary Probe over Recruitment

Why URA is facing a Parliamentary Probe over Recruitment

July 15, 2023

In a petition filed by 167 people led by Among Byamugisha, a retired captain of the National Resistance Army, they contended that although the UPDF Act contains certain provisions that give Military Courts jurisdiction to try civilians for criminal offenses in some instances, these provisions are unconstitutional because they are contrary to the dictates of a number of provisions in the 1995 Constitution.

The petitioners contended that the basic objective of the UPDF is to preserve and defend the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Uganda and therefore has no role in dispensing justice to the civilian population. They also added that even if the UPDF had powers to try civilians, the bar set by the constitution to what constitutes a fair trial is too high to be met by the military courts. They said the military courts cannot be independent and impartial because the members of that court lack security of tenure as they are appointed for a period of one year and they dissolve anytime at the discretion of the convening authority.

They argued that members of the military court are appointed by the High Command whose Chairperson is the President, a politician who may convene the court to achieve political objectives, and that they are not separate from the executive but are an extension of it and they try cases investigated by the military and prosecuted by the military contrary to natural justice, that an accuser should not be a judge in his cause.

The petitioners also contended that because the military court panels are made of people who are not lawyers, they face a problem of appreciating complex issues of evidence. They, therefore, implored the court to rule unconstitutional several sections of the UPDF Act that relates to trying civilians in military courts.

In her ruling joined by Justices; Kenneth Kakuru and Geoffrey Kirwabwire, Musoke held that by parliament enacting the UPDF Act, it acted beyond its powers by creating courts that were never envisaged in the constitution.

“It becomes clear that the framers of the 1995 constitution intended that, as a general rule, only the Courts spelled out under Article 129(1) would be involved in the administration of justice for civilians. These courts are the Supreme Court, the court of Appeal, and the High court as superior courts of record. The framers of the 1995 constitution also permitted Parliament to create such subordinate Courts as it would deem fit… it is in my view, incontrovertible that Military courts are not courts of judicature…that as a general rule, such Military Courts have no role in the administration of justice for civilians. They are neither Superior Courts nor subordinate Courts,” held Musoke.

She added that the framers of the 1995 Constitution intended to establish an armed force, whose chief function was to defend the sovereignty of Uganda, and that they allowed the UPDF to exercise additional functions, but these functions did not extend to the field of administration of justice for civilians.

“The framers permitted Parliament to make laws for the regulation of the UPDF, but these laws…couldn’t relate to the functions of the UPDF, and not purport to venture into a realm of functions which could not be exercised by the UPDF…Parliament was authorized to make a law to regulate the discipline of members of the armed forces. The Military Courts may be linked to the discipline of members of the armed forces, not to the discipline of civilians. Yet Parliament, when purporting to proceed…, created Military courts and gave them judicial powers to try non-members of the armed forces,” ruled Musoke.

Having found that military courts have no jurisdiction to try civilians, the court ordered all files currently under consideration to be remitted to the Director of Public Prosecution for onward management.

“The petitioners propose that this Court orders that civilians who have been charged and are awaiting trial in Military Courts, and those whose trials have been partially completed, should have their cases transferred to civilian Courts and taken over by the Director of Public prosecutions. In my view, this Court is obligated to make this order, which flows from the finding that Military Courts have no jurisdiction to try civilians. I would therefore order that cases in which civilians have been charged before the Military Courts but have not been tried, and those in which trial has been partially completed, should immediately be transferred to a competent civilian Court of Judicature,” added Musoke.

She however declined the petitioners’ other prayer of annulling all the convictions that the military courts handed over to civilians in the past.  “In the present case, Military Courts were exercising a lawful mandate under the UPDF Act, when they tried, convicted, and sentenced several civilians for criminal offenses prior to the date of this decision. Considering that this Court has only found that mandate unconstitutional, it follows that applying the principle of prospective annulment, the relevant convictions, and sentences rendered prior to this decision shall remain valid. However, any trial, conviction, or sentencing of a civilian in a Military Court- henceforth shall be rendered null and void ab initio,” ruled Musoke, and awarding Byarugaba, the lead petitioner costs.

The Court’s ruling is not different from that which was issued on July 1, 2021, in which it also held that military courts were not courts of judicature that the constitution talks about. The 2016 challenge to the UPDF Act which creates Court martial, was brought by then Nakawa Division Member of Parliament Michael Kabaziguruka. In the lead judgment written by Justice Keneth Kakuru and joined by Justice Remmy Kasule and Hellen Obura, the court observed that the UPDF Act was never intended to be an Act of general application.

“It does not extend to regulation or adjudication of crime set up under other legislation. Those functions are provided for in other Articles of the Constitution that establish the judiciary, the Police and Prisons Service, and the Directorate of Public Prosecutions among others. The General Court Martial, therefore, is a specialized Court set up by Parliament to deal with military discipline within the UPDF….it lacks all the tenets of an ordinary Court of law established under chapter eight of the Constitution. The Court-Martial is not part of the judiciary. It is part of the executive arm of government established under chapter twelve of the Constitution which provides for the country’s Defense and National security,” the judgment reads in part.

It also ordered that all files of civilians in military courts should be transferred to the high court in 14 days under the stewardship of the DPP.

The Attorney General who, is sued on behalf of the government disagreed with the ruling and appealed it in the Supreme Court, which is yet to determine it. In that judgment Justices; Christopher Madrama and Steven Musota dissented; ruling that for as long as civilians are subject to military law for example in the case of being found with military hardware, a preserve of the armed forces, then the Court Martial has powers to try them.

This thinking is also echoed in the present ruling of Justice Monica Mugenyi who was joined by Deputy Chief Justice Richard Butera in dissent. In her leading dissent, Mugenyi held that: “The circumstances under which this may arise cannot be identical with each nation-state but they must of necessity be spelled out succinctly in a public law… I find no merit in the assertion that the investigation and prosecution of matters before military courts by military persons renders the said courts an extension of the Executive branch of government. ln the same vein, it seems to me that a legal aid service that is well versed with military processes may be more astute for purposes of courts-martial than those with a legal background,” held Mugenyi.

Additional reporting by URN

Tags: Court MartialJustice Elizabeth MusokeMichael KabazigurukaNakawa Division Member of ParliamentUganda
Previous Post

Uganda’s President Museveni begs ADF Combatants to Choose between Submission and Death

Next Post

Uganda Human Rights Chief Attacks Cabinet for Attempting to Grabs its Powers

Related Posts

She Cranes Coach Mugerwa Threatens to Resign over Mistreatment

byMoses Kalaire | UNN Times Reporter
August 8, 2023
0
She Cranes Coach Mugerwa Threatens to Resign over Mistreatment

KAMPALA - The Cranes’ coach Fred Mugerwa has threatened to resign on the Ugandan national netball team returned home from...

Read more

Why the NRM Gov’t Can Never Meaningfully Conserve Uganda’s Environment

byUNN Times Editor | UNN Times Editorial
July 21, 2023
0
Does Environmental Justice in Uganda Matter Anymore?

By Oweyegha-Afunaduula Towards the beginning of the 1980s - the University of Nairobi, Kenya, was the only institute in the...

Read more

Linking Ugandan Society to Military Occupation, Militarisation and Criminalisation

byUNN Times Editor | UNN Times Editorial
July 20, 2023
0
Does Environmental Justice in Uganda Matter Anymore?

By Oweyegha-Afunaduula If you asked me why I decided to link military occupation, militarisation and criminalisation of Uganda’s society, I...

Read more

How to De-nranize Uganda Electoral Processes

byUNN Times Editor | UNN Times Editorial
July 16, 2023
0
Does Environmental Justice in Uganda Matter Anymore?

By Oweyegha-Afunaduula NRA is the abbreviation for National Resistance Army – the rebel group that waged an armed revolt against...

Read more

Bill-gating Science to Conquer God’s great Nature project

byUNN Times Editor | UNN Times Editorial
July 14, 2023
0
Does Environmental Justice in Uganda Matter Anymore?

By Oweyegha-Afunaduula I am sure you have never heard of the verb bill-gating. Well, I have coined it from two...

Read more

Norbert Mao and the Echoes of Opposition Politics in Uganda

byUNN Times Editor | UNN Times Editorial
July 2, 2023
0
Ofwono Opondo on Namuganza Censure, Erias Lukwago and Gen Saleh’s Memo

By Ofwono Opondo The ever jocular Norbert Mao a.k.a. Won kom, and venerable President General of Democratic Party - DP,...

Read more
Next Post
Uganda Human Rights Chief Attacks Cabinet for Attempting to Grabs its Powers

Uganda Human Rights Chief Attacks Cabinet for Attempting to Grabs its Powers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

About us

UNN is a new people powered TV channel, Radio station and Newspaper leading the revolution. We’re a media outlet focused on inspiring and empowering you while telling the truth, because as they say, the truth will set you free.

Recent

She Cranes Coach Mugerwa Threatens to Resign over Mistreatment

Why the NRM Gov’t Can Never Meaningfully Conserve Uganda’s Environment

Linking Ugandan Society to Military Occupation, Militarisation and Criminalisation

The Concept of types of Knowledge and its Integration

Of Ugandans’ Craziness for Modernisation

Advancing Science in African Universities through Integration Experience

Follow Us

Tweets by GetUNN

Facebook

© 2023 UNN Times

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Featured stories
  • Editors Choice
  • Trending Stories
  • News
  • Africa Today
  • Opinion
  • Literature
  • Videos
  • Sports

© 2023

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.